10 CLOVERFIELD LANE
Film Review by Fiore
No movie has disappointed me in quite a long time like 10
Cloverfield Lane. The film is a total waste of time, building
anticipation for a plotline that never develops. A bit of history is in order to comprehend
the disillusionment of this film.
Years ago,
J.J. Abrams visited Japan. He was
overwhelmed by the iconic status of Godzilla
there. He admired how the King of
Monsters was used in advertisements for all types of products and services and
how it pervaded the culture. He had a
vision – to create an American monster that would capture the American psyche
and become just as big a part of the country’s culture.
To that
affect, he made Cloverfield. The movie spawned the ‘found footage’ deluge
still plaguing the monster and horror genre today. Cloverfield was a big-budget novelty
film, but the monster, barely seen except for a few quick shots in the movie’s
final reel, failed dismally to capture viewers’ interest.
Abrams
claimed the monster in the movie, though causing much havoc, was only a baby
and that mamma monster was coming. This conjured
images of Gorgo to giant
monster lovers everywhere. He also
claimed Cloverfield would be
a trilogy, but as the box office results for America’s new monster sunk slowly
in the bog and years passed with no additional word, Cloverfield seemed to be Abrams Folly.
Excitement augmented when a closed set project, simply
known as Valencia, turned out
to be 10 Cloverfield Lane,
the second film in the promised trilogy.
The movie’s true identity was not known until the advertising campaign
began; a secret better kept than Oliver Queen being the Green Arrow.
10 Cloverfield Lane is
a terrible movie. It is 90 minutes of
slow, plodding comic book superficial character studies. The story begins with Michelle, played by Mary
Elizabeth Winstead, one of the dreaded three-name people. She has a fight with voice-over only boyfriend
Ben (Bradley Cooper), and can’t handle the situation like an adult so she packs
up her stuff, leaves her engagement ring on the dresser, and runs away from
home. A car accident finds her in the
bomb shelter of Howard, played by John Goodman.
Howard rescues Michelle, saves her life, and puts her in his bomb
shelter because there has been an attack, either biological or chemical and the
air is not safe to breath. In the bunker
with them is Emmitt (John Gallagher, Jr.).
These two are not, hopefully, representative of the Net Generation; she
can’t handle confrontations, and he can’t handle challenges. Howard shifts from survivalist to loon,
seemingly at the whim of screenwriter Josh Campbell who doesn’t know
what to do with the character.
KEY SCENES TO LOOK FOR:
1.
The crutch
attack
2.
The first escape
attempt.
While some
may consider this a spoiler, I consider it a public service announcement when I
tell you 10 Cloverfield Lane
has nothing to do with the original. Don’t
look for the monster, it’s simply not in the movie. In fact, the only thing this has in
connection with the original is the use of the word Cloverfield in the
title. This thing shifts from unique
monster, to overly used and seen space worms.
Perhaps Abrams has spent too much time with Han Solo, or on the
Enterprise.
10 Cloverfield Lane cost $15 million to make, and made
$24 million on its opening weekend.
Unfortunately, this may encourage Abrams to complete the trilogy. I
didn’t like the first movie and I loathe this second endeavor. Don’t waste your money on this
one. Wait until it comes onto TV in a
Sci-Fi Saturday night event. Perhaps multiple
commercial breaks and frequent trips to the frig can help 10 Cloverfield Lane seem enjoyable.
THE GRADE FOR 10 Cloverfield Lane = F
No comments:
Post a Comment