NO CLUE
Film review by Fiore
OVERALL:

Initially, I thought the film had potential. Placed in more adept hands, it could be
something worth watching. Then, the
third act unfolded and any concepts of salvaging his debacle dissipated quicker
than ice cream on a July afternoon in Phoenix.
PLOT:
Mike, played by Hugh Massey, is a waiter at a
non-descript restaurant in a non-descript town.
He is monotone, both in his dialogue delivery and his facial
expression. An actor, with stage, or in
this case, camera fright. He has a
girlfriend, Charlotte, who wants to be known as Lara, played by Emily Killian.
She is not worth the grief she puts Mike through and acts like too many women
who think they are special, but do not have the qualities to make them so. While Lara acts very much like Mike’s
girlfriend, she won’t let him admit she is, yet, she is quick to risk her life
for a ridiculous quest. A film will
naturally suffer when the male and female leads can’t live up to their roles. Just ask Luc Besson, with his recent VALERIAN
debacle.
MIKE
BOY begins with an assassination of a mother and her
infant child. We never discover why they
were killed. The next scene introduces
us to Mike, and without the aid of graphics, viewers must assume decades have
passed and Mike is the infant child from the opening scene. Mike is a wimp. He is lorded over by everyone in his life;
his co-workers, his boss, Lara, and her father.
There are flashbacks to an incident of bullying when he was young, but
its context to the story is immaterial.
One day, Mike is confronted by a one-eyed man who
tells him all of life boils down to a battle between two opposing secret
societies. He charges Mike with
completing several jobs to help ensure the safety of the free world, and for
doing so, he will learn about his past.
Gerard Sanders plays the one-eyed man, Agent Chris. He is as convincing in his role as a cereal
box top.

PARTICULARS:
Like most Indie films, MIKE BOY is shot in poor
light. Whether this is done due to
having either no, or a poor lighting director is always suspect. Cinematography Gonzalo Digneo is nondescript
and editing by Slava Denisov is amateurish, with almost no concern for aesthetic
quality.
The true problem with MIKE BOY however is the
script. Hamzen Tarzan directed, wrote
and even contributed to some camera work for the film. While this is common in Indie films for the
principal to perform multiple tasks, Tarzan needed more concentration on his
script. Even if he cleaned up the lame
story, the dialogue is atrocious.
Stilted, uneven and forced, it sabotages any possible story salvation.
Family videos have more emotional content than MIKE BOY.
REPORT CARD:
ACTING = F
CINEMATOGRAPHY = D
SOUND/MUSIC = D
EDITING = F
LIGHTING = F
SCRIPT = F
SFX = D
ACTION = D
SUMMARY:
I generally try to find something positive in a movie,
or at least attempt to identify its target audience. Mike is not a good protagonist. The character is not liked in the movie, and
certainly no one watching will find any redeeming or empathetic characteristics
in his persona.
There is a massive continuity break in the sequence
with the yellow envelope that is never addressed, and the conclusion is so
absurd it borders on the retarded. I
can’t find anything of value in MIKE BOY. Feel free to comment below, and enlighten me,
if you do.
REWATCHABLE INDEX: NONE
No comments:
Post a Comment