Film Review by FIORE

With THE LITTLE STRANGER, Irish filmmakers
team with British filmmakers and the movie plods through two hours of celluloid
as if it were a week. The fidgeting I
did in my seat was not due to scares or gore or even tension. It was derived from a general anxiety of
“getting on with it”. The British are
known for a methodical pace in their period pieces. Mixed with the Irish horror pace, THE LITTLE STRANGER will enable you to
multitask other chores and duties while still retaining the plotline. Penned by Lucinda Coxen, the script also has
overly extended scenes, so commonplace with female screenwriters.
While THE LITTLE STRANGER is slow, it is also
moody. It is a psychological, Gothic
thriller. Pay no never mind to the
trailers. This is not a BlumHouse or
Hammer Film production. There are no
“boo” scenes, nor any nail-biting sequences.
The story unfolds at a proper English manner with the utmost pomp and
circumstance.
What helps
this film immensely is the cinematography of Ole Bratt Birkeland. He uses extreme close-ups with set shots,
highlighting characters when needed and setting mood otherwise. The quick cuts between the two serve to keep
the viewer off guard. The technique
helped keep me to the final reel.

In the
hidden core of THE LITTLE STRANGER is
an odd, quirky message. It’s one of class struggle, with the common man prevailing
against the bourgeois, but at a rather steep cost. It would be communistic, if it weren’t so
decidedly negative. It is, however, war
which facilitates the common man victory; an odd subplot in the script.
The final
scene in THE LITTLE STRANGER is worthwhile. In retrospect, there was foreshadowing in the
script, but I did not pick up on it, and I am usually adept at these
things. While the twist at the end did
not make up for all the film’s sins, it certainly did make it more
palatable.
No comments:
Post a Comment